Case Study: Lysosomal Storage Disorder
Beyond Coding Data: Identifying Patients with a Rare Lysosomal Storage Disorder
Client
A biopharmaceutical organisation working in rare neurodegenerative diseases engaged GDS for a project in an ultra-rare lysosomal storage disorder for Europe.
The objective
The objective was to identify where expertise resides and which clinicians not only diagnose but also manage patients, while also supporting the integration of these insights into its CRM system. The aim was to improve visibility across the care landscape and ultimately support better access to new therapies for patients in Europe affected by this rare progressive disease.
The challenge
In ultra-rare diseases, identifying the clinicians and centres involved in patient care can be complex due to several structural factors:
- Traditional scientific output capture only part of the clinical landscape: The rarity of the disease results in limited scientific activity, meaning it does not capture all clinicians involved in diagnosing or managing the diseas.
- Multi-specialty patient pathways and misdiagnosis; Many rare diseases present with non-specific symptoms, meaning that patients may initially receive alternative diagnoses before the correct condition is identified. Consequently, patients may enter the healthcare system through clinicians treating related or overlapping conditions. Although these clinicians may not ultimately diagnose or treat the rare disease, they can play an important role in the early stages of the patient pathway.
- Limitations of healthcare coding systems; Rare diseases are often grouped within broader diagnostic categories in healthcare coding systems (e.g. the ICD-10 classification system). As a result, datasets may miss centres actively diagnosing and treating patients while including others not involved in the specific disease area.
GDS’s Approach
To overcome these challenges, GDS applied a broad analytical framework rather than relying solely on scientific visibility or healthcare coding systems.
Clinician analysis included:
- Evaluation of scientific activity related to the disease.
- Analysis of the most correlated conditions to identify additional clinicians involved in the disease through related scientific activity.
- Assessment of broader indicators of expertise, including society roles, departmental affiliations, leadership roles, and other institutional signals
These multidimensional signals were integrated to build a comprehensive understanding of each clinician’s relevance within the disease landscape
This approach revealed clinicians and centres actively involved in patient care that were not visible in traditional datasets.
